Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900F - 221 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 28 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - CA$329.49 vs CA$517.99
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$517.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74167 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
87.33031674208145%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
100%
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
57.02619938754678%
Multi-Core
8426
43.61960967023865%
Intel Core i7-14700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |