Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1587 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 240 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - CA$201.47 vs CA$339.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-12700F - CA$0.87 vs CA$1.41 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.41/FPS
61%
Price, CA$
CA$339
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
232
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$201.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$201.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |