Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-6100 - 180 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - CA$98.43 vs CA$339.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-12700F - CA$0.69 vs CA$1.88 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.88/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$339
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
142
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |