Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2677 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1620 - 130 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
107
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10875H | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |