Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700 is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 214 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$1.79 vs CA$1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - CA$369.9 vs CA$383.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$383.99
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.82/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |