Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1713 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron G1840 - 160 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$41.21 vs CA$153.88
- Up to 72% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i5-9400F - CA$0.27 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14416 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
152
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |