Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3416 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 60% better in F1 23 than Phenom II X4 830 - 218 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$147.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$147.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |