Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 187 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$297.85 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$297.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75543 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
96.79144385026738%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
21%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75543 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
84.60982658959537%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |