Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$188.88 vs CA$2179.65
- Up to 90% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.44 vs CA$14.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9400 - 148 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
131
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$14.73/FPS
9%
Price, CA$
CA$2179.65
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,179.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |