Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1707 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 82% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-8350 - 133 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 112 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - CA$182.45 vs CA$387.75
- Up to 14% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-7640X - CA$2.5 vs CA$2.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 8 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.92/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$387.75
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$387.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
73
54%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |