Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$34.05 vs CA$257.46
- Up to 84% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.31 vs CA$1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-760 - 130 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
111
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$34.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$34.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4153 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.98/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$257.46
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$257.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |