Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 48% better in Rust than Celeron G1840 - 231 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$41.21 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.26 vs CA$1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
156
67%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |