Buy on Amazon
CA$34.05
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2832 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$34.05 vs CA$158.07
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 25% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i5-760 - 110 vs 88 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core I5-760 I5 760 2.8 GHz Used Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 8M 95W LGA 1156
Buy for CA$34.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75187 minutes ago
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700 R7 2700 3.2 GHz Eight-Core Sixteen-Thread 16M 65W CPU Processor Socket AM4 YD2700BBM88AF
Buy for CA$158.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
41.02333931777379%
Multi-Core
1280
23.319366004736747%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
