Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 4922 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - CA$41.21 vs CA$225.21
- Up to 80% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i3-14100 - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.93 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 14% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-760 - 242 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
213
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
242
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$225.21
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$225.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |