Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$198.99 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 72% better value when playing Saints Row than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.26 vs CA$4.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Saints Row than Core i5-7400 - 159 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$198.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$198.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.57/FPS
27%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |