Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400 is 219 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$221.0 vs CA$890.53
- Up to 75% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$1.61 vs CA$6.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$221
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$221 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2127 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.5/FPS
24.76923076923077%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
24%
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
99.57482993197279%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |