Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 654 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - CA$221.0 vs CA$769.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-9900X - CA$0.92 vs CA$3.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-7400 - 243 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
239
98.35390946502058%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$221
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$221 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1959 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
243
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.16/FPS
29.11392405063291%
Price, CA$
CA$769
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1961 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
79.03225806451613%
Multi-Core
3232
33.963850357292976%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |