Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 9% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G3900 - 169 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - CA$67.56 vs CA$244.5
- Up to 70% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-6600T - CA$0.44 vs CA$1.45 per FPS
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
30.344827586206897%
Price, CA$
CA$244.5
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$244.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3667 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
155
91.71597633136095%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$67.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.195596951735816%
Multi-Core
992
30.77877753645672%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |