Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 546 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 13% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1620 - 174 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - CA$32.99 vs CA$350.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-4690K - CA$0.21 vs CA$2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 55 vs 88 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.01/FPS
10.447761194029852%
Price, CA$
CA$350
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
88.50574712643679%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
31.77933177933178%
Multi-Core
723
19.911870008262188%
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
88 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |