Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2793 days newer than Core i5-430M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 34% better in War Thunder than Core i5-430M - 166 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-430M - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-430M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |