Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4210U outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4210U is 915 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4210U
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8150 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4210U - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
167
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4210U | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 14th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |