Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4200U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4200U is 183 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4200U
- Performs up to 23% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1620 - 112 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
91
81%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4200U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |