Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2181 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450S - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-3450S - CA$142.72 vs CA$327.18
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450S - CA$1.12 vs CA$2.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$327.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
127
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |