Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$127.87 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-3450 - 271 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
212
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$127.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$127.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13655 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
271
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.48/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$400
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13655 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |