Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 2073 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - CA$127.87 vs CA$328.88
- Up to 57% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-8700 - CA$0.53 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-3450 - 270 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
240
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$127.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$127.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18578 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
270
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$328.88
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |