Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2625 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$127.87 vs CA$315.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$1.37 vs CA$2.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3450 - 111 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
93
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$127.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$127.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18120 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.84/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$315
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |