Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1258 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i3-8350K - 206 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$318.88 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Control than Core i9-11900K - CA$1.58 vs CA$1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 91 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.94/FPS
81%
Price, CA$
CA$400
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12362 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
202
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |