Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3427U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3427U is 185 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 17 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
90
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |