Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms Core i5-3427U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 144 days newer than Core i5-3427U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Core i5-3427U - 252 vs 251 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |