Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-3380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1703 days newer than Core i5-3380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3380M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Core i5-3380M - 55 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
55
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3380M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |