Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 979 days newer than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900F - 149 vs 134 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
| 20 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
