Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 27% better in Remnant II than FX-6100 - 99 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - CA$98.43 vs CA$244.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-12600K - CA$1.26 vs CA$2.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.47/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$244.99
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$244.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
78
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |