Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 2681 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than FX-8370 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - CA$220.0 vs CA$249.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Control than Core i5-12500 - CA$1.11 vs CA$1.21 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
91%
Price, CA$
CA$249
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
199
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |