Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1356 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600 - 130 vs 119 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - CA$142.72 vs CA$187.89
- Up to 17% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12400 - CA$1.2 vs CA$1.45 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
82%
Price, CA$
CA$187.89
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$187.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24864 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24864 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |