Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 180 vs 165 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$304.99 vs CA$1074.19
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.69 vs CA$6.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7747 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
165
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.51/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
28%
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |