Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$304.99 vs CA$853.05
- Up to 60% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-14900F - CA$1.07 vs CA$2.7 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-11600K - 316 vs 285 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13504 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
316
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.7/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$853.05
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$853.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |