Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 41% better in Dota 2 than FX-4300 - 234 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$36.09 vs CA$219.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-11600 - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.94 per FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$219.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$219.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
166
70%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |