Buy on Amazon
CA$219.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 30% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G3900 - 232 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$42.99 vs CA$219.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-11600 - CA$0.24 vs CA$0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
232
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$219.99
19%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$219.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
179
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
