Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 32% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6100 - 202 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - CA$98.43 vs CA$282.16
- Up to 54% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11500 - CA$0.64 vs CA$1.4 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$282.16
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$282.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
153
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |