Buy on Amazon
CA$246.41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - 136 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$41.21 vs CA$246.41
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600KF - CA$0.36 vs CA$1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.81/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$246.41
16%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for CA$246.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
115
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I5-760 I5 760 2.8 GHz Used Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 8M 95W LGA 1156
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
