Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6100 - 175 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - CA$80.8 vs CA$162.99
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$162.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74408 minutes ago
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |