Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 167 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 62 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18020 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |