Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-8130U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1421 days newer than Core i3-8130U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-8130U - 153 vs 148 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |