Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1946 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1620 - 142 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
38.11742777260019%
Multi-Core
723
23.88503468780971%
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |