Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4237 days newer than Core i3-550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 24% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-550 - 110 vs 89 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-550 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |