Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 188 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1620 - 320 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
316
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |