Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1523 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Core i3-3250 - 185 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
45.31516183986371%
Multi-Core
1130
16.198394495412842%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |