Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$69.88 vs CA$222.88
- Up to 66% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10600KF - CA$0.47 vs CA$1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3220 - 161 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
150
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18122 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$222.88
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$222.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |