Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - CA$69.88 vs CA$222.31
- Up to 63% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-14100 - CA$0.37 vs CA$1.0 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3220 - 222 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
191
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18836 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
222
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$222.31
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$222.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18835 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |