Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 288 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - CA$80.8 vs CA$220.54
- Up to 58% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-14100 - CA$0.32 vs CA$0.77 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
288
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.77/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$220.54
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$220.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4145 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
249
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$80.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |